Leave it in "God's" hands or your local geneticist? - probability of muscular dystrophy
Has anyone seen the film Gattaca? If so, you know what I mean.
When (not), if the days when we genetically program / engineer our children, right? Taking into account all possible genetic defects, congenital malformations, etc., etc., the chances that your license in the hands of God "or human hands? (A man who uses very advanced and scientifically sound technology)
I genetically engineer my son to be "perfect" (although there is no such thing, I'm sure) and then leave the collaboration between God and the nature of the f * ck them on.
What happens when genetic sequencing revealed that her unborn child has a high probability of potentially painful and debilitating and even fatal disease? (Cerebral Palsy, Erb's palsy, muscular dystrophy, and the list is long). Would you allow the fetal gene therapy or for treatment of the opportunities for your child?
Probability Of Muscular Dystrophy Leave It In "God's" Hands Or Your Local Geneticist?
17 comments:
I agree with much of what White Wolf said.
Do not wait to use the term "Hand of God" within the meaning of "natural fertility", and that the wart believes in God, is neither here nor there.
Someone said to kill our children. I do not know what he's talking about. Nobody talks about being a child murderer.
An embryo is not a child. An embryo is a child behind if I could survive outside the womb. The blastocyst is not a child but had a child.
The danger in the creation of centers adopt ideal for children (for me) laws, on a central government that is perfect and what is not.
I firmly believe that if you place the order babies are always possible, then it must be entirely the choice of the parents, not the government.
For example, religious or Luddite who wants to have a baby, of course, independent of genetic risk factors. Good for me.
Some people may be the blond hair and blue eyes and hair and black eyes, or select Male RAther than females. Nice.
Some people want to make sure their children are, as heterosexual (CFSP) do not want "it" in our family. That depends on them. If the parents have gay children, would probably have a terrible life for the child anyway.
And then you have to be excluded from real illnesses. Who's in general, but (with one exception, the superfluous is the time we can actually design our own children) gene expression is often more complex than just deleting the gene, one particular train. What if homosexuality are genes associated genes of artistic ability, or fertility? What happens if the genes are linked to Alzheimer's disease with genes for a long life?
We must be careful if you are a character trait that a person considers it desirable, not to remove, even delete it as desirable, even necessary.
And we must ensure that there are still trying to understand these diseases and not only to recognize. The natural variation of human genetics has the potential toteach us a lot about us.
But if these diseases have been interpreted as the point where it would not be treated and cured, then it's fair screening fetuses for medical reasons.
I personally do not believe that my son have to live with a disease like you mentioned. I opted for a blastocyst can not develop guidelines which, through a full pregnancy, but no one wants to select a particular character, because for me, is part of the wonders of diversity: not knowing exactly what you get.
Absolutely. The error that you have failed to take into account, is that there is no way that even genetecists from the hands of God, or can not escape geneticist.
Edited to add, I can not understand me, I mean, it is not possible, a geneticist, to remove from the hands of God, even if they think they are.
Absolutely. The error that you have failed to take into account, is that there is no way that even genetecists from the hands of God, or can not escape geneticist.
Edited to add, I can not understand me, I mean, it is not possible, a geneticist, to remove from the hands of God, even if they think they are.
Hello,
I will leave it to God to give us. I can not and will not allow others to play with my God, my wife or my son's life. My wife and I will take your child to be as normal or abnormal and grateful to him (God) for his gift.
Hello,
I will leave it to God to give us. I can not and will not allow others to play with my God, my wife or my son's life. My wife and I will take your child to be as normal or abnormal and grateful to him (God) for his gift.
People have killed their children because they can be a condition such as spina bifida or cerebral paulsy have, because you can try things. The company is on an inclined plane, as it thinks it is okay to kill our children, then we will continue sliding
I do not know. At the moment the only one on paper, but I would expect from a world like Gattaca fear.
I think the answer is no. But I have a child at home, I am not very confident of the medical profession.
If I could resolve potential problems in my children, hell, yes I would.
If I could resolve potential problems in my children, hell, yes I would.
No, I havent and I am not against it.But my children are adults.
No, I havent and I am not against it.But my children are adults.
No, I havent and I am not against it.But my children are adults.
Although the scenario a few hurdles in the way of the Hitler-like striving for perfection of mankind .... I see nothing wrong with science to improve anything. I think any father would be all they can to survive his son to help prevent disease and live a good life.
We "play God" every day. Most of us are sitting here in front of our computers, this question not be here today if not for a medical procedure. For example, if you have already taken antibiotics, which were rescued from a life-threatening. Each day, the women of the birth by caesarean section. Each day, the elderly, medical, or else he would have died just a few decades ago. Almost every person living in a First World country today by medical advances have not influenced use.
So it surprises me when people draw their own imaginary line stuck in the sand and say:-or-play what "God". Are the same people who had no ethical dilemma on the plAyinger God, if their doctors to dispense drugs or treatments to be expensive. Who can decide that is the cutoff? It's a terribly slippery slope, trying to determine what is right and what is not. You are either for or against. If you're playing against God, it means that he would refuse any medical treatment?
God did not give us the intelligence and the ability to develop this technology amazing? Why not use?
Although the scenario a few hurdles in the way of the Hitler-like striving for perfection of mankind .... I see nothing wrong with science to improve anything. I think any father would be all they can to survive his son to help prevent disease and live a good life.
We "play God" every day. Most of us are sitting here in front of our computers, this question not be here today if not for a medical procedure. For example, if you have already taken antibiotics, which were rescued from a life-threatening. Each day, the women of the birth by caesarean section. Each day, the elderly, medical, or else he would have died just a few decades ago. Almost every person living in a First World country today by medical advances have not influenced use.
So it surprises me when people draw their own imaginary line stuck in the sand and say:-or-play what "God". Are the same people who had no ethical dilemma on the plAyinger God, if their doctors to dispense drugs or treatments to be expensive. Who can decide that is the cutoff? It's a terribly slippery slope, trying to determine what is right and what is not. You are either for or against. If you're playing against God, it means that he would refuse any medical treatment?
God did not give us the intelligence and the ability to develop this technology amazing? Why not use?
Even when programming a computer program can be very important.
If you know what you do, go ahead.
If you are a student programming or just someone with experience of less than 7 years of programming experience I did.
also successful species must have a tremendous amount of genetic variation. It is like reporting on the stock exchange.
Keep in mind, which means that the security of the species in the risk of many diseases, for one person.
Also the mentality of people towards nature. Remember that part of human nature. = What we are doing what nature does.
also for people who are already breeding. to see how the Europeans have almost exterminated the Indians, and with them their genetic variation.
Even when programming a computer program can be very important.
If you know what you do, go ahead.
If you are a student programming or just someone with experience of less than 7 years of programming experience I did.
also successful species must have a tremendous amount of genetic variation. It is like reporting on the stock exchange.
Keep in mind, which means that the security of the species in the risk of many diseases, for one person.
Also the mentality of people towards nature. Remember that part of human nature. = What we are doing what nature does.
also for people who are already breeding. to see how the Europeans have almost exterminated the Indians, and with them their genetic variation.
Even when programming a computer program can be very important.
If you know what you do, go ahead.
If you are a student programming or just someone with experience of less than 7 years of programming experience I did.
also successful species must have a tremendous amount of genetic variation. It is like reporting on the stock exchange.
Keep in mind, which means that the security of the species in the risk of many diseases, for one person.
Also the mentality of people towards nature. Remember that part of human nature. = What we are doing what nature does.
also for people who are already breeding. to see how the Europeans have almost exterminated the Indians, and with them their genetic variation.
Post a Comment